Should 2021 NBA Draft Alperen Sengun have been picked first?

2021 NBA draft - Alperen Sengun has scouts vowing they won't repeat their  Nikola Jokic mistake - ESPN

Should 2021 NBA Draft Alperen Sengun have been picked first?

It’s true. To add insult to injury, it is getting closer and closer to being “right on time.” We have the privilege of being able to preach patience because we are fans. The developmental curves of all people, including Steve Nash, are not linear.

The front offices do not have the same amount of free will. Now is the moment to make a decision. In the near future, the class of 2021 will become eligible for extension. In the future, general managers will be required to make crucial decisions that will have an effect on their salary sheet. The evaluation of athletes in comparison to their contemporaries will occur as a component of the decision-making process.

During the draft in 2021, should Sengun have been selected first?
Those who are good with numbers will appreciate Sengun’s point of view. If he is not one, the advanced statistics indicate that he is two years old.

Let’s begin with the Box Plus/Minus (BPM) measurement. Sengun is tied for the highest mark among players that are in their third year of playing. At 6.1 shots per game, he and Scottie Barnes are tied for tenth place in the NBA. Do the remaining members of their class have a position?

Not even close. Jalen Johnson, who plays for the Atlanta Hawks, is the next player to make an appearance. His score of 2.2 places him fifty-first in the league overall. The players Franz Wagner and Evan Mobley are ranked 62nd and 69th, respectively, in terms of the number of players that anyone could reasonably consider selecting first in a redraft.

The current score of -0.7 for Jalen Green places him outside of the top 100. The current rating of Cade Cunningham is -3.7, which I believe places him somewhere in the vicinity of one hundred millionth in the NBA.

An analogous picture is painted by the Value Over Replacement Player (VORP) algorithm. Sengun is ranked tenth in the NBA with a 1.4, while Barnes is ranked ninth with a 1.6. Everyone else is not within walking distance of the location. Based on your choices, it would appear that the choice is between Sengun and Barnes, right?The top two are determined, are they?
But let’s not rush things.

Before reaching a conclusion predicated on two compound measures, there are a few normative arguments that need to take place. Let’s begin with Cunningham, who is the true leading candidate for the position.

2021 NBA Draft scouting report: Alperen Sengun - Peachtree Hoops
The Pistons of Detroit are not a complete and utter failure. The entire globe is being consumed by a blazing fire that they have started. The current situation is not suitable for evaluation. It is true that Cunningham is committing 4.3 turnovers per game each and every time. It is a terrible thing (checks notes). When he is surrounded by this supporting cast, it is simple to swarm and harass him. This is something that should be taken into consideration. It is too many non-shooters that Detroit plays. As a result, their offensive rotation is rife with offensive problems. If you were to take Cunningham and have him play for the Utah Jazz at this very moment, it would be impossible to predict where his impact statistics would go.

When it comes to Mobley, the situation is a little bit more complicated. The Cavaliers are a reliable team. It would appear that he would not be a good fit for a typical big like Jarrett Allen to play beside him. It is possible that Mobley would benefit from a full-time shift to the five position; alternatively, he could continue to play at the four position at the same time as a defensive free safety with a large player who spans the floor.Last but not least, the hipsters will continue to take Wagner. They are going to take him as seriously as they take their freshly brewed cup of Kopi Luwak Black (which, according to Google, is the coffee made from bat feces). Neither do I see it. However, in my opinion, Wagner is a perfect fit for the number two position. He is an incredible player.

According to your (re)draft philosophy, it is dependent. There is a factor known as projection; you can still believe that Green has the highest ceiling. It is reasonable. If, on the other hand, an established track record is more important to you, then you should go with either Sengun or Barnes.

To what?Was it Sengun or Barnes?
A call like this is extremely challenging to make.

A comparison using the B-Ball Index does not make the situation any simpler. What we already know is revealed to us by this. In terms of offensive performance, Sengun is superior, whereas Barnes is superior in terms of defensive play.

The Stable Isolation Points Per Possession metric shows that there is a significant gap between the two. He is in the 84.1st percentile of the population. 1.6 is the percentile that Barnes falls into. Oh my goodness.

That being said, Sengun is a significantly superior scorer. Both in isolation and in the pick-and-roll, he is very effective. The reason that Sengun is in the 80th percentile in terms of overall shot quality while Barnes is in the 36.1% percentile is presumably because of this.

The fact that you are reading this indicates that you are very likely a fan of the Rockets, and as a result, you are most likely presuming that he is also a far superior passer. According to Index, they are comparable. When it comes to the number of assists points per 75 possessions, Sengun is in the 89.9th percentile, whereas Barnes is in the 86th percentile. Barnes is a really good passer; all he needs to do is find more ways to generate opportunities for himself in the halfcourt area.

When it comes to defensive positions, Barnes is in the top 50 percentile in terms of the amount of time spent guarding every position other than off-guard (44.7th). Sengun is almost only responsible for protecting the five. With that being said, Barnes is in a better position in every defensive category that Index has available to them.

Here, once again, it comes down to a matter of individual preference. I would choose a flexible defensive wing with playmaking chops over a defensively limited playmaking large if you would allow me to beat the same dead horse that I have already beaten to death. From a philosophical standpoint, I would choose the former.

As a general rule.

I believe that there is a very serious case to be made that Sengun is so far ahead of his contemporaries offensively that he needs to be selected first. This is something that I believe can not be denied in practice. This is especially true when one takes into consideration the fact that he is making positive defensive progress. There is a possibility that Domantas Sabonis will not be able to compete with Ime Udoka’s plan. It is quite unlikely that he possesses the quick hands or reflexes necessary to hedge and recover in the same manner that Sengun has been doing this year.

On the other hand, it is difficult to argue against the portability of Barnes. Finding players that are capable of both shooting and defending is necessary in order to construct the best possible squad around Sengun. Considering that you are constructing around Barnes, you can afford to have a weak link in your defense. In the end, it is highly unlikely that you will make a mistake with either option. In the 2021 NBA draft, Sengun was selected at a ridiculously low position. This much is abundantly evident.

It is not too soon to make such a statement.

Leave a Comment